|
Journal Articles: Please note: Reprints and copies of journal articles are provided for scholarly purposes only and may not be distributed without the permission of the copyright holders. In Press: 82. Becker, S.I. , Manoharan, R.T., & Folk, C.L. (in press). The Attentional Blink: A Relational Account of Attentional Engagement. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 81. Remington, R.W., Vromen, J.M.G, Becker, S.I., Baumann, O., & Mattingley, J.B. (in press). The role of the frontoparietal cortex across the functional stages of visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 80. York, A., Sewell, D. K., & Becker, S.I. (in press). Dual target search: Attention tuned to relative features, both within and across dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 79. Harris, A.M., Jacoby, O., Remington, R.W., Becker, S.I., & Mattingley, J.B. (2020). Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for a dissociation between working memory capacity and feature-based attention. Cortex, 129, 158-174. [pdf] 78. Dai, C., Pi, D., & Becker, S.I. (in press). Shapelet-transformed multi-channel EEG channel selection. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology. [pdf] 77. Dai, C., Wu, J., Pi, D., Becker, S.I., Cui, L., Zhang, Q. & Johnson, B. (in press). Brain EEG time series clustering using maximum weight cliques. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. [pdf] 76. Schönhammer, J.G., Becker, S.I., & Kerzel, D. (2020). Attentional capture by context cues, not inhibition of cue singletons, explains same location costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46, 610-628. [pdf] 75. York, A., & Becker, S.I. (2020). Top-down modulation of gaze capture: Feature similarity, optimal tuning, or tuning to relative features? Journal of Vision, 20(4):6, 1-16. [pdf] 74. Ernst, D., Becker, S.I., & Horstmann, G. (2020). Novelty competes with saliency for attention. Vision Research, 168, 42-52. [pdf] 73. Dai, C., Pi, D. Becker, S.I., Wu, J., Cui, L. & Johnson, B. (in press). CenEEGs: Valid EEG selection for classification. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD). [pdf] 72. Horstmann, G., Becker, S.I., & Grubert, A. (in press). Dwelling on simple stimuli in visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. [pdf] 71. Becker, S.I., Atalla, M. & Folk, C.L. (2020). Can we simultaneously bias attention to features and relations? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 246-268. [pdf] 70. Horstmann, G. & Becker, S.I. (2020). More efficient search for happy targets may not indicate guidance, but rather faster distractor rejection: Evidence from eye movements and fixations. Emotion, 20, 206-216. [pdf] 2019 69. Horstmann, G., Ernst, D., & Becker, S.I. (2019). Dwelling on distractors varying in target-distractor similarity. Acta Psychologica, 198, 1-10. [pdf] 68. Becker, S.I., Martin, A. & Hamblin-Frohman, Z. (2019). Target templates in singleton search vs. feature-based search modes. Visual Cognition, 27, 502-517. [pdf] 67. Hamblin-Frohman, Z. & Becker, S.I. (2019). Attending object features interferes with visual working memory regardless of eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45, 1049-1061. [pdf] 66. Cornish, L., Hill, A., Horswill, M., & Becker, S.I. (2019). Eye-tracking reveals how observation chart design features affect the detection of patient deterioration: An experimental study. Applied Ergonomics, 75, 230-245. (pdf) 2018 65. Martin, A. & Becker, S.I. (2018). How feature relationships influence attention and awareness: Evidence from eye movements and EEG. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 1865-1883. (pdf) 64. Remington, R.W., Burt, J.S., & Becker, S.I. (2018). The curious case of spillover: Does it tell us much about saccade timing in reading? Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 80, 1683-1690. (pdf) 63. Becker, S.I. (2018). Reply to Theeuwes: Fast, feature-based top-down effects, but saliency may be slow. Journal of Cognition, 1:28, 1-3. (pdf) 2017 62. Horstmann, G., Becker, S.I., & Ernst, D. (2017). Dwelling, rescanning and skipping of distractors explain search efficiency in difficult search better than guidance by the target. Visual Cognition, 25, 291-305. (pdf) 61. Enns, J.T. et al. (2017). Linking Contemporary Research to the Classics: Celebrating 125 years at APA [editorial]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 1695-1700. (pdf) 60. Becker, S.I., Dutt, N., Vromen, J.M.G. & Horstmann, G. (2017). The capture of attention and the gaze in search for emotional photographic faces. Visual Cognition, 25, 241-261. (pdf) 59. Schönhammer, J.G., Becker, S.I. & Kerzel, D. (2017). Which kind of attention is captured by cues with the relative target color? Visual Cognition, 25, 703-714. (pdf) 58. Constable, M.D. & Becker, S.I. (2017). Right away: A late, right-lateralized category effect complements an early, left-lateralized category effect in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24, 1611-1619. (pdf) 57. Becker, S.I., Harris, A.M., York, A., & Choi, J. (2017). Conjunction search is relational: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 1828-1842. (pdf) 56. Becker, S.I., Lewis, A.J., & Axtens, J.E. (2017). Top-down knowledge modulates onset capture in a feedforward manner. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 436-446. (pdf) 2016 55. Horstmann, G., Herwig, A. & Becker, S.I. (2016). Distractor dwelling, skipping, and revisiting determine target absent performance in difficult visual search. Frontiers in Psychology, 15(7), 1-13. (pdf) 54. Vromen, J.M.G., Lipp, O.V., Remington, R.W. & Becker, S.I. (2016). Threat captures attention, but not automatically: Top-down goals modulate attentional orienting to threat distractors. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 2266-2279. (pdf) 53. Horstmann, G., Becker, S.I., & Ernst, D. (2016). Perceptual salience captures the eyes on a surprise trial. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 1889-1990. (pdf) 52. Schönhammer, J.G., Grubert, A., Kerzel, D., & Becker, S.I. (2016). Attentional guidance by relative features: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Psychophysiology, 53, 1074-1083. (pdf) 51. Retell, J.D., Becker, S.I., & Remington, R.W. (2016). Previously seen and expected stimuli elicit surprise in the context of visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 774-788. (pdf) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50. Savage, R.A., Becker, S.I., & Lipp, O.V. (2016). Visual search for emotional expressions: Effect of stimulus set on anger and happiness superiority. Cognition & Emotion, 30, 713-730. (pdf) 49. Retell, J.D., Becker, S.I., & Remington, R.W. (2016). An effective attentional set for a specific color does not prevent capture by infrequently presented motion distractors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1340-1365. (pdf) 2015 48. Ziaei, M., von Hippel, W., Henry, J.D., & Becker, S.I. (2015). Are age effects in positivity influenced by the value of distractors? PLoS ONE, 10, 1-15. (pdf) 47. Harris, A.M., Becker, S.I., & Remington, R.W. (2015). Capture by colour: Evidence for dimension-specific singleton capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 2305-2321. (pdf) 46. Becker, S.I., & Lewis, A.J. (2015). Oculomotor capture by irrelevant onsets with and without color contrast. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1339, 60-71. (pdf) 45. Retell, J.D., Venini, D., & Becker, S.I. (2015). Oculomotor capture by new and unannounced color singletons during visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 1529-1543. (pdf) 2014 44. Becker, S.I., Grubert, A., & Dux, P.E. (2014). Distinct neural networks for target feature versus dimension changes in visual search, as revealed by EEG and fMRI. Neuroimage, 102, 798-808. (pdf) 43. Schneider, D., Slaughter, V.P., Becker, S.I., & Dux, P.E. (2014). Implicit false-belief processing in the human brain. Neuroimage, 101, 268-275. (pdf) 42. Becker, S.I., Valuch, C. & Ansorge, U. (2014). Color priming in pop-out search depends on the relative color of the target. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:289, 1-11. (pdf) 41. Craig, B.M., Becker, S.I., & Lipp, O.V. (2014). Different faces in the crowd: A happiness superiority effect for schematic faces in heterogeneous backgrounds. Emotion, 14, 794-803. (pdf) 40. Venini, D., Remington, R.W., Horstmann, G., & Becker, S.I. (2014). Centre-of-gravity fixations in visual search: When looking at nothing helps to find something. Journal of Ophthalmology, 237812, 1-14. (pdf) 39. Ansorge, U., & Becker, S.I. (2014). Contingent capture in cueing: The role of color search templates and cue-target color relations. Psychological Research, 78(2), 209-221. (pdf) 38. Becker, S.I. (2014). Guidance of attention by feature relationships: The end of the road for feature map theories? In Horsley, M., Eliot, M., Riley, R., and Knight, B. (Eds.) Current Trends in Eye Tracking Research. Springer (pp. 37-49). (pdf) 37. Becker, S.I., Horstmann, G., & Herwig, A., eds. (2014). Eye Movement Control. Journal of Ophthalmology, Article ID: 262541, 1-2. (pdf) 36. Becker, S.I., Harris, A.M., Venini, D., & Retell, J.D. (2014). Visual search for colour and shape: When is the gaze guided by feature relationships, when by feature values? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(1), 264-291. (pdf) 2013 35. Becker, S.I. (2013). Simply shapely: Relative, not absolute shapes are primed in pop-out search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 845-861. (pdf) 34. Savage, R.A., Lipp, O.V., Craig, B.M, Becker, S.I., & Horstmann, G. (2013). In search for the emotional face: Anger vs. happiness superiority in visual search. Emotion, 13, 758-768. (pdf) 33. Barutchu, A., Becker, S.I., Carter, O., Hester, R., & Levy, N.L. (2013). The role of task-related learned representations in explaining asymmetries in task switching. PLoS ONE, 8, 1-10. (pdf) 32. Bayliss, A.P., Murphy, E. Naughtin, C.K., Kritikos, A., Schilbach, L., & Becker, S.I. (2013). ‘Gaze leading': Initiating simulated joint attention influences eye movements and choice behaviour. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 76-92. (pdf) 31. Becker, S.I., Folk, C.L., & Remington, R.W. (2013). Attentional Capture does not depend on Feature Similarity, but on Target-Nontarget Relations. Psychological Science, 24, 634-647. (pdf) 30. Becker, S.I., & Ansorge, U. (2013). Higher set sizes in pop-out search displays do not eliminate priming or enhance target selection. Vision Research, 81, 18-28. (pdf) 29. Harris, A.M., Remington, R.W., & Becker, S.I. (2013). Feature specificity in attentional capture by size and colour. Journal of Vision, 13:12, 1-15. (pdf) 28. Valuch, C., Becker, S.I., & Ansorge, U. (2013). Priming of fixations during recognition of natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 13:3, 1-22. (pdf) 27. Becker, S.I. (2013). Why you cannot map attention. A relational theory of attention and eye movements. Australian Psychologist, 48, 389-398. (pdf) 2012 26. Ansorge, U., & Becker, S.I. (2012). Automatic priming of attentional control by relevant colors. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 83-104. (pdf) 25. Horstmann, G., Lipp. O.V., & Becker, S.I. (2012). Of toothy grins and angry snarls − Open mouth displays contribute to efficiency gains in search for emotional faces. Journal of Vision, 12(5):7, 1-15. (pdf) 24. Priess, H., Scharlau, I., Becker, S.I., & Ansorge, U. (2012). Spatial mislocalization as a consequence of sequential coding of stimuli. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 365-378. (pdf) 23. Schneider, D., Bayliss, A.P., Becker, S.I., & Dux, P.E. (2012). Eye movements reveal sustained implicit processing of mental states. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 433-438. (pdf) 2011 22. Becker S. I. (2011). Determinants of dwell time in visual search: Similarity or perceptual difficulty? PLoS One, 6 (3), 1-5. (pdf) 21. Becker, S.I., & Horstmann, G. (2011). Novelty and saliency in attentional capture by unannounced motion singletons. Acta Psychologica, 136, 290-299. (pdf) 20. Becker, S. I., Horstmann, G., & Remington, R. W. (2011). Perceptual grouping, not emotion, accounts for search asymmetries with schematic faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1739-1757. (pdf) 19. Horstmann, G. & Becker, S.I. (2011). Evidence for goal-independent attentional capture from validity effects with unexpected novel color cues ̶ A reply to Burnham (2007). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 512-517. (pdf) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010 18. Ansorge, U., Carbone, E., Becker, S. I., & Turatto, M. (2010). Attentional capture by motion onsets is spatially imprecise. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 62-105. (pdf)17. Becker, S. I. (2010). The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 247-265. (pdf) 16. Becker, S.I., (2010). Testing a post-selectional account of across-dimension switch costs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 853-861. (pdf) 15. Becker, S.I. (2010). Oculomotor capture by irrelevant colour singletons depends on intertrial priming. Vision Research, 50, 2116-2126. (pdf) 14. Becker, S.I., Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2010). The role of relational information in contingent capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1460-1476. (pdf) 13. Horstmann, G., Becker, S.I., Bergmann, S., & Burghaus, L. (2010). A reversal of the search asymmetry favouring negative schematic faces. Visual Cognition, 18, 9811016. (pdf) 2009 12. Ansorge, U., Becker, S. I., & Breitmeyer, B. G. (2009). Revisiting the metacontrast dissociation: Comparing sensitivity across different measures and tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 286-309. (pdf) 11. Becker, S. I., Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2009). Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search? Vision Research, 49, 1738-1756. (pdf) 10. Becker, S. I., Ansorge, U., & Turatto, M. (2009). Saccades reveal that allocentric coding of the moving object causes mislocalisation in the Flash-Lag Effect. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 1313-1324. (pdf) 9. Becker, S. I., & Horstmann, G. (2009). A feature weighting account of priming in conjunction search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 258-272. (pdf) 2008 8. Becker, S. I. (2008). Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1417-1440. (pdf) 7. Becker, S. I. (2008). The stage of priming: Are intertrial repetition effects attentional or decisional? Vision Research, 48, 664-684. (pdf) 6. Becker, S. I. (2008). The mechanism of priming: Episodic retrieval or priming of pop-out? Acta Psychologica, 127, 324-339. (pdf) 5. Horstmann, G., & Becker, S. I. (2008). Attentional effects of negative faces: Top-down contingent or involuntary? Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1416-1434. (pdf) 4. Horstmann, G., & Becker, S. I. (2008). Effects of stimulus-onset asynchrony and display duration on implicit and explicit measures of attentional capture by a surprising singleton. Visual Cognition, 16, 290-306. (pdf) 2007 3. Ansorge, U., Breitmeyer, B. G., & Becker, S. I. (2007). Comparing sensitivity across different processing measures under metacontrast masking conditions. Vision Research, 47, 33353349. (pdf) 2. Ansorge, U., Neumann, O., Becker, S. I., Kaelberer, H., & Cruse, H. (2007). Sensorimotor supremacy: Investigating conscious and unconscious vision by masked priming. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 257-274. (pdf) 1. Becker, S. I. (2007). Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: Attentional capture or filtering costs? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 764-787. (pdf)
Invited Talks:
03 / 2019 Harvard University, USA: Talk: Testing a relational account of attention and visual working memory.
03 / 2019 University of Pennsylvania, USA: Talk: A relational account of attention, eye movements and visual working memory.
03 / 2019 Villanova University, U SA: Talk: A relational account of attention, eye movements and VSTM.
09 / 2018 University of East Anglia, UK: Talk: The role of the context in maintaining information in VSTM.
09 / 2018 Durham University, UK: Talk: Are objects stored as individual items in VSTM, or does the context matter?
08 / 2018 UCL, UK, Talk: Can the relational account of attention and eye movements be extended to VSTM?
05 / 2018 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands: Talk: A relational account of attention, eye movements, and VSTM.
06 / 2015 CLaS-CCD Eye Tracking Workshop: Language, perception, vision, and their interface. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. Talk: Feature-based attention operates on relative features.
04 / 2014 Queensland Brain Institute and Munich Center for Neurosciences Autumn Workshop, Heron Island, Queensland, Australia. Talk: Feature-based attention operates on relative features.
03 / 2014 Conference Competition and Priority Control, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research (ZiF), Bielefeld, Germany. Commentary Talk: Attention and Prediction.
12 / 2013 University of Sydney, Australia. Talk: What factors guide visual attention?
08 / 2013 University of Melbourne, Australia. Talk: Are there feature detectors? Or is visual selection determined by relative features?
07 / 2013 Visual Attention Workshop, University of Vienna. Talk: Are feature maps really feature- specific? A new relational account of attention and eye movements.
07 / 2013 Workshop Competition and Priority Control, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research (ZiF), Bielefeld, Germany. Talk: The end of the road for feature map theories? Attention is guided by relative features.
09 / 2012 APS Annual Conference, Perth, Australia [invited as winner of the APS Early Career Researcher Award].
07 / 2012 University of Vienna, Austria. Talk: A critical test of feature map theories: Can we tune attention to a specific feature value?
07 / 2012 University of East Anglia, UK. Talk: The role of feature relationships for attention, conscious perception and awareness.
07 / 2012 Third Symposium on Visual Search and Selective Attention (VSSA III), Ammersee, Germany. With Prof. Ulrich Ansorge; Talk: Target-nontarget relations determine ‘bottom-up’ feature priming and ‘top-down’ contingent capture: A call for a unified account of top- down/bottom-up guidance?
06 / 2012 First Inaugural EyeTrack Conference Australia 2012. Talk: Top-down tuning of attention is relational and guides the gaze to the most extreme feature values. (keynote speaker)
11 / 2011 Colour Workshop, Macquarie University, Sydney. Talk: Involuntary capture by colour does not depend on colour similarity, but on similarity in target-nontarget relations.
11 / 2011 EyeTrack Behaviour Conference (ETB) Frankfurt. Talk: The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search.
03 / 2011 University of Sydney, Australia. Talk: Everything is relative: How information about target- distractor relationships helps finding the target in visual search.
11 / 2010 University of Melbourne, Australia. Talk: The importance of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes.
07 / 2009 LMU Munich, Germany. Talk: What are the factors that guide visual attention? - A new approach.
06 / 2009 DGP / University of Giessen, Rauischholzhausen, Germany. Talk: Intertrial Priming and Distractor Effects in Visual Search [invited as finalist for dissertation contest].
03 / 2009 Psychology Seminar Series, The University of Queensland, Australia. Talk: What are the factors that guide visual attention? - A new approach.
04 / 2006 Mind/Brain Center, University of Trento, Italy. Talk: The Flash Lag Effect: Temporal or Spatial Illusion?
09 / 2006 Siemens Business Services (SBS), Paderborn, Germany. Data-Mining Analysis of Eye Tracking Data with SQL and Oracle.
Conference Presentations:
Reprints are provided for academic and scholarly purposes only and may not be used or distributed for any other purpose without permission from the copyright holders.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||